Sunday, June 22, 2014

Society’s False Belief

            Stephanie Coontz is the author of A Strange Stirring, who references the 1960’s book, The Feminine Mystique by Betty Friedan, in order to remind the readers of how important the book was at the time. Although she mentions that she knew the book from her younger years, she had not actually read it before. The book when it first came out had a more significant effect on the women in society than it does today. One reason is that it seems to be outdated at times and that it was directed at women during this time. When Coontz is given the task to write a book on The Feminine Mystique, she researches a lot of content and interviews many women from this time period. The most impacting to her was the interviews she performed with the women that had been affected by this book.
            During World War II, women had their own jobs in factories, which gave them this sense of freedom. After the war, women were put in the homes while the men took their jobs. There was a lost “’sense of possibility’ that women felt in the 1920s, 1930s, and 1940s.”[1] At this point, it seemed that women were less concerned about equal rights than they did in the earlier years. Women were taught to grow up as housewives to take care of their children and husband. Many women during the 1960s had their mind set on marrying someone and fulfilling society’s definition of the role of a female. At that point they were locked into a marriage, which was always to be the women’s job to take care of family and home.
            There were many prejudices towards women, which gave few options for them to independently live. Society geared these people to find a spouse, who would take care of the family financially. Women were not allowed to even do the simplest activities. “Prejudice and discrimination were pervasive in small things as well as big. Elementary schools did not allow girls to be crossing guards or to raise and lower the American flag each day, nor could girls play in Little League sports”[2] This is because people believed that, “girls should be channeled into activities that would prepare them for homemaking and motherhood.”[3]

http://www.corbisimages.com/eimage/Corbis-42-20036790.jpg?size=67&uid=38e11c0a-f64c-490f-b501-7e6984b230c6

            Society during this time insisted that the women should marry then become a housewife and mother. People would think of a woman as a horrible wife to their husband if they were not completing their wifely duties. Housewives were portrayed as some who was only concerned of taking care of her children home, and husband.Most Americans believed that the “normal” life for a modern mother was to become a homemaker in a male-breadwinner family and live according to the cultural stereotypes about womanhood that Friedan described as the feminine mystique.”[4] Women were convinced that their only goal was to be a good mother, until The Feminine Mystique came out. The Feminine Mystique explained that women were not only put on this earth to be a good housewife, but allowed women to express their potential as human beings. “The source of ‘the problem with no name,’ she insisted, was that modern culture did not allow women, as it allowed men, to gratify a need that was just as important as sex— the ‘need to grow and fulfill their potentialities as human beings.’”[5]

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRs8hssq8hVm-KfXs6KTkKoIeLO6upG_hjd-nQNn-JpGKe_FRL3

As Coontz interviews the women from the 1960s, she realizes how much this book had impacted their lives. “Women who told me over and over that The Feminine Mystique transformed their lives, even that it actually ‘saved’ their lives, or at least their sanity.”[6] Some housewives were having feelings of discontent, boredom, and even depression during their housewife roles. They thought these feelings were caused by their own mental issues instead of society, since society believed that women were meant to have the role of a housewife. Specifically in society, it was considered that, “A normal woman found complete satisfaction in her role as homemaker, mother, and sexual companion to her husband.”[7] It was a relief to many women after reading The Feminine Mystique because it explains that they did not need psychiatric treatment for these rough feelings during their role as a housewife.[8] Although this book did not start the feminist movement in the 1960s, it sped up the inevitable action taken by these readers. The book put a whole new perceptive that women were not accustomed to, which drove them to believe that societies belief of them was not true.



[1] Stephanie Coontz, A Strange Stirring: The Feminine Mystique and American Women at the Dawn of the 1960s, 2011. Basic Books. Kindle Edition. (p. 36).
[2] Stephanie Coontz, Ibid., (p. 14).
[3] Stephanie Coontz, Ibid., (p. 70).
[4] Stephanie Coontz, Ibid., (p. 64).
[5] Stephanie Coontz, Ibid., (p. 25).
[6] Stephanie Coontz, Ibid., (Kindle Locations 200).
[7] Stephanie Coontz, Ibid., (p. 69).
[8] Stephanie Coontz, Ibid., (p. 87).

No comments:

Post a Comment